By Anthony Pendleton
University of Kentucky School of Journalism and Telecommunications
The
Midway Messenger requested a copy of the draft from Mayor Grayson Vandegrift,
who proposed the ordinance but expressed strong reservations about the language that reflected the Indiana legislation.
Section
Eight of the draft ordinance says, "No action taken under or required by
this ordinance shall burden a person's freedom of religion." It goes on to
say that "The right to act or refuse to act in a manner motivated by a
sincerely held religious belief may not be burdened unless it is proven by
clear and convincing evidence that the government has a compelling interest in
infringing the specific act or refusal to act and has used the least
restrictive means to further that interest." This means that the government
can only intervene in disputes involving religious beliefs if it can prove it
has a good reason and if it interferes as little as possible.
The draft of the Midway ordinance does not include the
original Section 9 of RFRA, which stated that "A person whose exercise of
religion has been substantially burdened, or is likely to be substantially
burdened, by a violation of this chapter may assert the violation or impending
violation as a claim or defense in a judicial or administrative proceeding,
regardless of whether the state or any other governmental entity is a party to
the proceeding." This would have allowed a person to use religious freedom as a
defense in court.
University of Kentucky School of Journalism and Telecommunications
City
attorney Phil Moloney’s draft of an ordinance to prohibit discrimination based
on sexual orientation and gender identity includes language similar to that of
Indiana's "restoration of religious freedom" law, which caused a
national controversy.
Other
language in the ordinance, which advocates call a "fairness ordinance," attempts to draw a line between freedom of expression
and discrimination.
Grayson Vandegrift |
Under
Section Five of the draft, it would be illegal to deny "goods, services,
facilities, privileges, advantages, and accommodations "on the basis of
"race, color, religion, national origin, sex, disability, gender identity,
or sexual orientation."
However, Section Five says it does not apply "with
regards to sex, sexual orientation, and gender identity" to such things as
restrooms, dormitories and other facilities segregated by sex, and Section
Five-E applies that exception to "Infringing upon the right of free
speech- expression of a provider of goods or services not to be compelled to
express a message with which they disagree." For a PDF of the draft, click here.
This exception means that a person or a business would not
have to sell or make something if they disagree with the product's message. For
example, Lexington T-shirt company Hands On Originals refused to print shirts
for the annual Lexington Pride Festival in 2012. Later that year, the
Lexington-Fayette Urban County Human Rights Commission determined that the
company had violated the city's fairness ordinance by discriminating based on
sexual orientation. Under Section Five of Midway's ordinance, that would not be
a violation.
Phil Moloney (2011 photo) |
The language in Section Eight is similar to part of the original version of
Indiana's Religious Freedom Restoration Act, which the Indiana legislature
dropped after some business interests said it would allow businesses to
discriminate against people in the LGBT community. Angie's List, which is based
in Indianapolis, put off plans to expand its headquarters. Apple CEO Tim Cook,
who is openly gay, criticized the bill in a Washington Post piece, saying
"This isn’t a political issue. It isn’t a religious issue. This is about
how we treat each other as human beings."
The
final version of the Indiana law says it does not authorize anyone to refuse to provide services, public accommodations,
housing, facilities, goods or employment on the basis of race, color, religion,
ancestry, age, national origin, disability, U.S. military service, sex, sexual
orientation or gender identity.
Asked
about the source of the language, Moloney said, "It's either language that
I composed or it may have come from some other ordinances we had taken a look
at."
Asked if any city council members had anything to do with
the language, Moloney said, "I've had a committee member express some
reservations."
The ordinance is being considered by the council’s Finance,
Ordinance and Policy Committee, chaired by Council Member Dan Roller. Council
Members Sara Hicks and Bruce Southworth are also on the committee.
Vandegrift emphasized that the
ordinance is still in the draft phase, saying "I suspect the committee is
gonna probably pull some things and probably add some things."
Vandegrift said he doesn't agree with all of the language in
the two sections. "I don't want to speak for the committee, but in my opinion,
[Section Five-E] and the passage in Section Eight kinda defeat the whole
purpose of the ordinance."
The committee will meet Tuesday at 2 p.m. at City Hall to
discuss the draft.
No comments:
Post a Comment