By Jackson Reams
University of Kentucky School of Journalism and Telecommunications
The rebuilding of the one-lane bridge on Weisenberger Mill
Road has again been delayed due to the public’s opposition to a completely new
bridge.
|
The bridge was built in 1930. (2013 photo by Nini Edwards) |
The road winds its narrow way through farmland
in Scott and Woodford counties with its namesake just inside Scott County. The
101-year-old Weisenberger Mill building sits on Elkhorn Creek, which is crossed
by an old one-lane bridge with an almost 90-degree curve on the Woodford County
approach.
The bridge has been marked for renovation or replacement
since 2010, and a meeting was held in January 2013 to see what the public
wanted done. The public preferred renovation, not replacement, so the state
studied whether that was possible.
Ananias Calvin, the project manager, said in a recent
interview that a crew was sent out to examine the bridge and found “extensive
work” was needed, so only one solution made sense.
“We came to the conclusion that this bridge will probably be
better if we just put in a new bridge,” Calvin said. The next step was to
decide if the city wanted to go with the public’s preference of a one-lane or a
two-lane bridge. “You have a two-lane road; why would you put a one-lane bridge
back?” Calvin asked.
That question was answered, to state officials' dismay, at a second public meeting at Midway
College Oct. 21 – a meeting that Calvin said the Transportation Cabinet wasn’t
required to hold, but did to inform the public of the new direction they were
taking.
“We wanted their response and we got it; they didn’t like it
at all,” Calvin recalled. The answer to his question was: a one-lane bridge
slows down traffic, a need on the narrow, curving road.
|
Debra Instone stands at her often-smashed fence in the curve. |
Debra Instone’s Mill Creek Farm is on the outside of the
90-degree curve, where vehicles have repeatedly crashed through a wooden fence.
“If they make that two-lane and people know they don’t have
to stop [for oncoming traffic that reaches the bridge first], the traffic’s
gonna get faster,” Instone said in an interview at the site.
Instone said she has lived on the property for 11 years and
someone has hit her fence “every year and this year three times.” She said,
“It’s a huge responsibility if one of my horses get on this road. They don’t
care if someone took my fence out, your horse is on here and someone hit it and
got hurt; that’s my fault.”
Calvin said he agrees with Instone that there is a problem:
“If you put in a two-lane bridge the speed will increase . . . because you
don’t have to slow down to allow whoever was at the bridge across first.”
However he said a two-lane bridge would be as safe as a
one-lane. “One was a traffic calmer,” he said. “The other one made it where two
cars can go across at the same time.”
Instone and Philip Weisenberger III, son of mill owner Mac
Weisenberger, said trucks trying to cross the 15-ton-limit bridge are also a
concern. “There are trucks that get down here and realize they can’t get across
the bridge,” he said. Instone said, “It takes them about 35 minutes to get
turned around and get back to where they came.”
Weisenberger added, “All the trucks that come to our place
turn around and back out, they never even cross. But I do see lots of trucks
going through here.”
Instone and her husband Giles Instone said in a letter to
Calvin that if a two-lane bridge goes in, they had four requests: “The current
weight limit for vehicles remain in place… A blinking light be added to the
15mph sign… The existing metal guard rail be extended to the west to the width
of the road… Raised bump strips [rumble strips] similar to those located on Old
Frankfort Pike be installed on the road.”
Calvin said the new bridge, one-lane or two, will not deter
traffic because the weight limit will no longer exist. “If it goes any lower than that, it might be
closed.”
Calvin said in a reply letter to the Instones that the
blinking light and rumble strips are possibilities, but “Since this is a county
road, we would have to work with the County Agencies concerning a blinking
light, rumble strips (raised bump strips), and the extension of the guardrail
around the curve.”
Woodford County had an agreement with Scott County to be
responsible for the bridge, but got the state to take responsibility in return
for the county working on a state bridge in Millville, according to outgoing
Midway Magistrate Larry Craig.
The Kentucky General Assembly appropriated $500,000 for replacement
of the bridge. That would not be enough to pay for a solution that has been
suggested by several members of the public: move the bridge slightly
downstream, to get the road away from the mill and line up the road with Paynes
Depot Road, which intersects Weisenberger Mill Road on the other side of the
curve from the bridge.
Likewise, Philip Weisenberger suggested in a letter to
Calvin that “a small curve be added into the road.”
|
The mill attracts customers, tourists, photographers and fishers. |
Calvin replied, “We have already looked at your idea of
implementing a curve on the Scott County side but since it would have increased
our construction cost beyond the amount budgeted, we decided not to.”
The Rev. Earl Raglin also lives just around the corner from
the curve on Paynes Depot Road. He said in an interview he supports “ripping
the bridge out and putting in a two-lane bridge” because “Quite a bit of
traffic is flowing across that bridge and I’m afraid a one-lane bridge won’t
accommodate that.”
But the views expressed at the meeting, and afterward, were
strongly against a two-lane bridge, according to the state’s file on the
matter. To download a 104-page PDF of the file,
click here.
“After the public meeting my supervisor/branch manager,
Robert Nunley, told us to step back and take another look,” Calvin said. “My
timetable just changed; I have no idea what it is. I had one until the public
meeting.”
Calvin said no ideas have been taken off the table, but the
state is making sure that they are absolutely positive what they want to do
before they move forward. Calvin said he doesn’t “know which way we are going
to go but we are going to reevaluate it.”
The announcement that of the reevaluation pleased both
Instone and Phil Weisenberger, who are fine with the current situation. “It
wouldn’t bother me if they kept what’s here now,” Weisenberger said.
Calvin, however, says the damage done to the bridge and its
supports means something must be done, but he is unsure of when that decision
will come: “It would be really hard to give a schedule because we have been
going back and forth so much.”
The next step could be putting more money for the bridge
into the state’s six-year road plan, but that plan is adopted in even-numbered
years and changing the state budget in odd-numbered years requires a 60 percent
vote in each house of the General Assembly.
Several Midway leaders attended the meeting including Tom Mayor Bozarth, Mayor-elect and Council Member Grayson Vandegrift, outgoing Council Member and then-mayoral candidate Sharon Turner, and Council Member-elect Libby Warfield. In written comments, Warfield said she was “convinced that [a] 2 lane would be a mistake” and “create many new problems for this area.”
UPDATE: In a Dec. 10
letter to Calvin, Patrick Hagan of Weisenberger Mill Road asked that the bridge be restored to its original condition and said, "All you are doing is ruining our quiet, peaceful community."